Skip to main content
Blog

R. v. H.P. (2025 ONCA 742) — Ontario Court of Appeal Dismisses Sex-Assault Appeal

By November 4, 2025No Comments

What Happened

In R. v. H.P. (2025 ONCA 742), the Ontario Court of Appeal upheld the conviction of a man found guilty of sexual assault, sexual interference, sexual exploitation, and invitation to sexual touching against his 15-year-old stepdaughter.

The key evidence was a secret bedroom audio recording made by the girl. The trial judge called it “objective, compelling, and persuasive.”
H.P. claimed the sounds were innocent — he said he only checked on her injured ankle and gave her a quick goodnight kiss.

But the trial judge didn’t believe him, and the Court of Appeal agreed: the recording matched the complainant’s story, not his.

What the Accused Argued on Appeal

H.P. said the trial was unfair because:

  1. The judge replayed and amplified the recording after trial.
  2. The judge misunderstood what was on it.
  3. The judge got the timeline wrong about his stepdaughter’s drug use, which he said was her motive to lie.
  4. The judge ignored inconsistencies in the complainant’s story.
  5. The judge misused an earlier complaint to the mother.

The Court of Appeal rejected all of it.

What the Court Decided

  • Listening to the recording again was fine. The trial judge was allowed to re-listen and turn up the volume. That’s part of judging real evidence.
  • The recording matched the complainant’s version. You could hear her saying “stop” and him whispering “okay baby.” That sounded sexual, not parental.
  • No important error about drugs. Even if the judge mixed up small details, it didn’t matter — the drug story didn’t explain the complaint to police.
  • No major inconsistencies. Minor differences don’t mean someone’s lying.
  • The prior complaint to her mother was used properly to explain what happened next, not to prove guilt.

Why This Case Matters

This case shows how hard it is to win a sexual-assault appeal in Ontario.
Appeal judges almost never change the verdict unless the trial was clearly unfair or legally wrong.

It also shows that:

  • Judges can listen to recordings and analyze them carefully.
  • Small mistakes don’t overturn verdicts.
  • Appeal courts trust trial judges on credibility — who they believe and why.

Bottom line: if you’re charged with a sex offence, you must win at trial.
Appeals rarely save the case later.

What You Should Learn From This

If you face sexual assault or sexual interference charges in Ontario:

  • Hire an experienced trial lawyer early. The defence starts long before trial.
  • Good cross-examination and strong evidence are what create reasonable doubt.
  • Don’t rely on “I’ll appeal if I lose.” Appeals are hard and slow.

Winning at trial can save your reputation, job, and family. Losing at trial can mean years in prison — and appeals rarely fix that.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can a judge use a secret recording against me?
Yes. If it’s real evidence of what happened, it’s usually admissible, even if it’s uncomfortable or private.

Can I appeal because the judge believed the wrong person?
Usually not. Appeals focus on legal errors, not credibility disagreements.

How long do I have to appeal in Ontario?
You normally have 30 days from sentencing to file a Notice of Appeal — talk to a criminal appeal lawyer right away.

Need Help After a Conviction?

If you’ve been charged or convicted of a sexual offence, contact David Genis, Toronto Criminal Defence and Appeal Lawyer.

David handles sexual assault trials and appeals across Toronto, Brampton, Oshawa, and York Region.

He can review your case, explain your chances, and fight to protect your freedom.